law school cases

RECOGNITION OF INDISPOSABLE ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR
GARCIA VS PAL
CAPITOL MEDICAL VS MERIS

PROTECTION TO LABOR
FUENTES, ET AL. VS NLRC
CAPILI VS NLRC
GARCIA VS NLRC
JAMER VS NLRC
GANDARA MILLS VS NLRC

CONSTRUCTION IN FAVOR OF LABOR
PLDT VS NLRC
CHERRY PRICE VS INNODATA

INTERPRETING CBA
MARCOPPER MINING VS NLRC

INTERPRETING STANDARD EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
PHIL. TRANSMARINE VS NLRC

EVIDENCE
DREAMLAND HOTEL VS JOHNSON
METROBANK VS NLRC

PRINCIPLE OF NON DIMINUTION OF BENEFITS
SEVILLA TRADING VS SEMANA


PEOPLE VS SENORON
PEOPLE VS PANIS
REPUBLIC VS PASEI
PEOPLE VS SADIOSA
PEOPLE VS LALLI
PEOPLE VS GUEVARRA
PEOPLE VS HERNANDEZ
PEOPLE VS TRINIDAD
SY VS PEOPLE
SUNACE VS NLRC
SAMEER VS CANILES
SERRANO VS GALLANT

RELIEF

BUCAL VS BUCAL

I. POLITICAL ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE

A. GENERAL CONSIDERATION

REPUBLIC VS SANDIGANBAYAN

MANILA PRINCE HOTEL VS GSIS

KNIGHTS OF RIZAL VS DMCI

SANTIAGO VS COMELEC 1997

LAMBINO VS COMELEC

MAGALLONA VS ERMITA

SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (CHINA VS PHILS) PDF


A.2 STATE IMMUNITY

DOTC VS ABECINA

REPUBLIC VS HIDALGO

UP VS DIZON 2012

BUISAN VS COA

NHA VS ROXAS

ARIGO VS SWIFT


A.3 SEPARATION OF POWERS AND CHECK AND BALANCES

SENATE OF THE PHILS VS ERMITA

KILUSANG MAYO UNO VS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF NEDA

IN RE: PRODUCTION OF COURT RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS

SILVERIO VS REPUBLIC

REPUBLIC VS GINGOYON (J TINGA) VS REPUBLIC VS GINGOYON (J CORONA)

OCAD VS REYES

MAMISCAL VS ABDULLAH


A. 4 DELEGATION OF POWERS

AMPATUAN VS PUNO

SOUTHERN CROSS CEMENT CORPORATION vs. CEMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES

SEMA VS COMELEC

NPC DRIVERS VS NPC



A.5 STATE PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES

DEUTSCHE BANK AG MANILA BRANCH VS CIR

IMBONG VS OCHOA

REPUBLIC VS ALBIOS



B. LEGISLATURE

1. CITY OF DAVAO VS RTC DAVAO

2. GSIS VS CITY TREASURER OF MANILA 2009

3. SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY VS DANGEROUS DRUGS BOARD

4. DAVID VS SENATE ELECTRONAL TRIBUNAL

5. AQUINO III VS COMELEC

6. ALDABA VS COMELEC

7. NAVARRO VS ERMITA

8. BANAT VS COMELEC

9. ATONG PAGLAUM VS COMELEC

10. ANG LADLAD VS COMELEC

11. COALITION OF ASSOCIATIONS OF SENIOR CITIZENS IN THE PHILIPPINES, INC. V COMELEC

12. LICO VS COMELEC

13. LOKIN VS COMELEC

14. SENERES VS COMELEC

15. LOKIN JR VS COMELEC 2012

16. REYES VS COMELEC 2013

17. VELASCO VS BELMONTE

18. TANADA VS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

19. TY-DELGADO VS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

20. ABAYON VS. THE HONORABLE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL

21. POBRE VS DEFENSOR SANTIAGO

22. TRILLANES VS MARIGOMEN PDF

23. LIBAN VS GORDON

24. SENATE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS ERMITA 2006

25. NERI VS SENATE COMMITTEE OF ACCOUNTABILITY 2008
      NERI VS SENATE COMMITTEE (J CARPIO)

26. ROMERO VS ESTRADA II

27. PHILCOMSAT VS SENATE

28. SANCHEZ VS COA 2008

29. BELGICA VS OCHOA

30. TESDA VS COA

31. ARAULLO VS AQUINO III

32. ABAKADA GURO VS PURISIMA


C. PRESIDENCY

1. PIMENTEL JR VS JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS

2. MACALINTAL VS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL

3. CLINTON VS JONES

4. RUBRICO VS MACAPAGAL ARROYO

5. RODRIGUEZ VS MACAPAGAL ARROYO

6. FUNA VS AGRA

7. PIMENTEL JR VS ERMITA

8. RUFINO VS ENDRIGA

9. DE CASTRO VS JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL
    DISSENTING J. BRION

10. AGUINALDO VS AQUINO III 2016
      2017

11. VELIRALIA GARAFIL VS OP

12. MANALANG-DEMIGILLO VS TIDCORP

13. ABAKADA GURO VS ERMITA

14. BIRAOGO VS PHIL TRUTH COMMISSION

15. ALMARIO VS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

16. RISOS VIDAL VS COMELEC

17. TIU VS DIZON

18. GUDNI VS SENGA

19. KULAYAN VS TAN

20. FORTUN VS MACAPAGAL ARROYO

21. LAGMAN VS MEDIALDEA

22. PADILLA VS CONGRESS

23. LAGMAN VS PIMENTEL III 2018 PDF

24. AKBAYAN VS AQUINO

25. VINUYA VS ROMULO

26. SAGUISAG VS OCHOA

27. CONSTANTINO JR VS CUISIA

28. FORTICH VS CORONA
       SEPARATE OPINION J. PUNO

29. OCAMPO VS ENRIQUEZ 2016
     2017 PDF


D/ JUDICIARY

1. LOZANO VS NOGRALES

2. GALICTO VS AQUINO

3. MOLDEX VS HLURB

4. SERRANO VS GALLANT

5. Re: COA Opinion on the Computation of the Appraised Value of the Properties Purchased by the Retired Chief/Associate Justices of the Supreme Court

6. RE: REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE/CLARIFICATION ON SECTION 7, RULE III OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10154 REQUIRING RETIRING GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES TO SECURE A CLEARANCE OF PENDENCY/NON-PENDENCY OF CASE/S FROM THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

7. IN THE MATTER OF: SAVE THE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND FISCAL AUTONOMY MOVEMENT v. ABOLITION OF JUDICIARY DEVELOPMENT FUND (JDF) AND REDUCTION OF FISCAL AUTONOMY

8. CHAVEZ VS JBC

9. UMALI VS JBC

10. VILLANUEVA VS JBC

11. RE: PETITION FOR RECOGNITION OF THE EXEMPTION OF THE GSIS FOR PAYMENT OF LEGAL FEES

12. ESTIPONA VS LOBRIGO





D. IMPEACHMENT

1 OMBUDSMAN VS CA 2005

2. GUTIERREZ VS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2011

3. CORONA VS SENATE 2012 (PDF)

4. REPUBLIC VS SERENO 5/11/18 (PDF)
    REPUBLIC VS SERENO 6/19/18 (PDF)

E. SANDIGANBAYAN AND OMBUDSMAN

1. GONZALES VS OP 2012
GONZALES VS OP 2014

2. OMBUDSMAN VS ANDUTAN JR

F. PUBLIC OFFICE AND RESPONSIBILITY

1. ARIAS VS SANDIGANBAYAN

2. REYES VS RURAL BANK OF SAN MIGUEL

3. CARPIO MORALES VS CA

ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH AND STATE RECOVERY

ARGANA VS REPUBLIC


H. TERMINATION AND OFFICIAL RELATIONS

1. BALDOZ VS COA

2. Re: Application for Retirement A.M. No. 14061- Ret of Judge Moslemen T. Macarambon under Republic Act No. 910, as amended by Republic Act No. 9946.

3. FETALINO VS COMELEC

4. OCAMPO VS COA

5. Re: Letter· of Court of Appeals Justice Vicente S.E. Veloso for Entitlement to Longevity Pay for His Services as Commission Member III of the National Labor Relations Commission

6. RE: APPLICATION FOR OPTIONAL RETIREMENT UNDER REPUBLIC ACT NO. 910, AS AMENDED BY REPUBLIC ACT NO. 5095 AND REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9946, OF ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, JR.



V. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

A. Fiscal Autonomy and Self-Reliance
1. LIMBONA VS MANGELIN

2. MIAAA VS CA

3. CITY OF LAPU LAPU VS PEZA

4. MCIAA VS CITY OF LAPU LAPU

5. PIMENTEL JR VS OCHOA

6. LEAGUE OF PROVINCES OF THE PHILIPPINES VS DENR

B. Local Autonomy and National Accountability
1. BATANGAS CATV VS CA

2. DISONGMANGCOP VS DATUMANONG

C. Local Autonomy and Decision Making
1. PROVINCE OF RIZAL VS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

2. BORACAY FOUNDATION VS PROVINCE OF RIZAL

3. SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY VS LIM

4. MOSQUEDA VS PILIPINO BANANA GROWERS

5. CITY OF BATANGAS VS PHIL SHELL


D. Creation and Alteration of Local Government Units

1. LCPVS COMELEC

2. NAVARRO VS ERMITA

3. UMALI VS COMELEC


E. Supervision Over and Discipline of Local Officials
1. Miranda vs Sandiganbayan

2. prov. govt of camarines norte vs gonzales

F. Organizational Structures
1. LA CARLOTA VS ROJO

2. VICENCIO VS VILLAR

G. TERM LIMITS AND RECALL

1.





D. SEARCHES AND SEIZURE
1. UNITED STATES VS GRUBBS
2. LAUD VS PEOPLE
3. LOS ANGELES COUNTY VS RETTELE
4. RILEY VS CALIFORNIA
5. LUZ VS PEOPLE
6. MARTINEZ VS PEOPLE
7. PEOPLE VS VILLAREAL
8. SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY VS DANGEROUS DRUGS BOARD
9. dela cruz vs people
10. kyllo vs united states
11. pollovs david
12. LUCAS VS LUCAS

E. PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
1. KILUSANG MAYO UNO VS DIRECTOR GENERAL
2. VIVARES VS ST. THERESE
3. LEE VS ILAGAN
4. DATA PRIVACY ACT OF 2012
5. EUROPEAN UNION'S GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATIONS

F. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, RIGHT TO ASSEMBLY AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM
1. CHAVEZ VS GONZALES
2. DISINI JR VS SEC. OF JUSTICE
3. MTRCB VS ABS CBN
4. SOCIAL WEATHER STATION VS COMELEC
5. GMA VS COMELEC 2014
6. DIOCESE OF BACOLOD VS COMELEC
7. I-UTAK VS COMELEC
8. RENO VS ACLU
9. RE: LETTER OF THE UP LAW FACULTY ENTITLED "RESTORING INTEGRITY: A STATEMENT BY THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES COLLEGE OF LAW ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF PLAGIARISM AND MISREPRESENTATION IN THE SUPREME COURT"
10. FORTUN VS QUINSAYAS
11. PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES VS DUQUE
12.PLEASATN GROVE VS SUMMUM


G. FREEDOM OF RELIGION
1. ESTRADA VS ESCRITOR
2. ANG LADLAD LGBT VS COMELEC
3. RE: LETTER OF TONY Q. V ALENCIANO, HOLDING OF RELIGIOUS RITUALS AT THE HALL OF JUSTICE BUILDING IN QUEZON CITY
4. VALMORES VS ACHAOSO


H. LIBERTY OF ABODE AND FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
1. GUDANI VS SENGA
2. LEAVE DIVISION, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES-OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR (OCA) VS WILMA SALVACION P. HEUSDENS, CLERK IV MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES, TAGUM CITY
3. SAMAHAN NG MGA PROGRESIBONG KABATAAN v. QUEZON CITY
4. GENUINO VS DE LIMA 2018

I. RIGHT TO INFORMATION
1. NAGKAKAISANG MARALITA NG SITIO MASIGASIG, INC VS MILITARY SHRINE SERVICES - PHILIPPINE VETERANS AFFAIRS OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
2. IN RE: Production of Court Records and Documents and the Attendance of Court Officials and Employees as Witnesses under the Subpoenas of February 10, 2012 and the Various Letters of the Impeachment Prosecution Panel dated January 19 and 25, 2012.
3. RE: REQUEST FOR COPY OF 2008 STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND NETWORTH [SALN] AND PERSONAL DATA SHEET OR CURRICULUM VITAE OF THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE JUDICIARY.
4. ANTOLIN VS DOMONDON
5. AIR PHILS CORPORATION VS PENNSWELL


J. RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION
1. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA VS DALE
2. BPI VS BPI EMPLOYEE


K. EMINENT DOMAIN
1. MANOTOK VS CA
2. HACIENDA LUISITA VS PARC
3. RP VS LIM
4. MACTAN CEBU VS LOZADA
5. OUANO VS RP
6. NPC VS IBRAHIM
7. NPC VS SANGKAY
8. NPC VS TARCELO

L. CONTRACT CLAIM
1. LEPANTO MINING VS WMC

M. FREE ACCESS TO COURTS
1.  RE: QUERY OF MR. ROGER C. PRIORESCHI RE EXEMPTION FROM LEGAL AND FILING FEES OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION, INC.

N. RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS
1.DICKERSON VS US
2. PEOPLE VS UY JR
3. PEOPLE VS REYES
4. PEOPLE VS MALNGAN
5. PEOPLE VS LAUGA

O. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
1. PEOPLE VS VALDEZ
2. GOVT OF HONG KONG VS OLALIA
3. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF CAPT. GARY ALEJANO, PN (MARINES) CAPT. NICANOR FAELDON, PN (MARINES) CAPT. GERARDO GAMBALA, PA LT. SG JAMES LAYUG, PN CAPT. MILO MAESTRECAMPO, PA LT. SG ANTONIO TRILLANES IV, PN HOMOBONO ADAZA, and ROBERTO RAFAEL (ROEL) PULIDO,
4. ENRILE VS SANDIGANBAYAN
5. QUI VS PEOPLE
6. Re: CONVICTION OF JUDGE ADORACION G. ANGELES, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 121, CALOOCAN CITY IN CRIMINAL CASE NOS. Q-97-69655 to 56 FOR CHILD ABUSE
7. PEOPLE VS ABULON
8. RE: PETITION FOR RADIO AND TELEVISION COVERAGE OF THE MULTIPLE MURDER CASES AGAINST MAGUINDANAO GOVERNOR ZALDY AMPATUAN, ET AL.,
9. GO VS PEOPLE
10. JAYLO VS SANDIGANBAYAN

P. PRIVILEGE OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
WRIT OF AMPARO
WRIT OF HABEAS DATA

1. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF DATUKAN MALANG SALIBO, DATUKAN MALANG SALIBO,
2.SEC OF NATIONAL DEFENSE VS MANALO
3. RAZON VS TAGITIS
4.DE LIMA VS GATDULA
5. NAVIA VS PARDICO
6. PADOR VS ARCAYAN
7. MERALCO VS LIM
8. GAMBOA VS CHAN
9. CARAM VS SEGUI

Q. SELF-INCRIMINATION
1. DISINI VS SANDIGANBAYAN
2. UNITED STATES VS BALSYS


R. DOUBLE JEOPARDY
1. PEOPLE VS VELASCO
2. PEOPLE VS ATIENZA
3. PEOPLE VS SANDIGANBAYAN (FOURTH DIVISION)
4. IVLER VS MODESTO-SAN PEDRO


S. EX POST FACTO LAWS AND BILLS OF ATTAINDER
1. SALVADOR VS MAPA
2. VALEROSO VS PEOPLE
3. REPUBLC VS COJUANGCO
4. BOCEA VS TEVES


VII. CITIZENSHIP

1. POE-LLAMANZARES VS COMELEC
2. REPUBLIC VS SAGUN
3. CALILUNG VS DATUMANONG
4. DAVID VS AGBAY
5. MAQUILING VS PEOPLE
6. REPUBLIC VS KARBASI
7. REPUBLIC VS HARP

VIII. EDUACATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ARTS, CULTURE AND SPORTS
1. UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN VS CA
2. UP BOARD OF REGENTS VS CA
3. DE LA SALLE VS CA
4. LEUS VS ST. SCHOLASTICA

IX. PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
1. PIMENTEL VS OFFICE OF THE EXEC SEC
2. ZIVOTOFSKY VS KERRY
3. SEC. JUSTICE VS LANTION
4. PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO VS GOV OF RP
5. TANADA VS ANGARA
6. LIANG VS PEOPLE
7. MINUCHER VS CA
8. GOVERNMENT OF HONG KONG VS MUNOZ
9. HAMDI VS RAMSFIELD
10. MEDELLIN VS TEXAS
11. NICOLAS VS ROMULO